Bhor sa sanjh tak

Friday, October 30, 2015

Chapter 4: CHALUKYAS OF BATAPI & KING NANYADEVA, THE KARNA KAYASTHA RULER OF MITHILA

CHALUKYAS OF BATAPI & KING NANYADEVA, THE "KARNA KAYASTHA" RULER OF MITHILA:

Thirteen centuries before Christ, as per Dr.R.C.Mazumdar, in the great war of ‘Mahabharata’, thousands of kings and princes of both Solar and Lunar races were killed and there was a great political vacuum up till the time of the Mauryan dynasty. Dr.R.C.Mazumdar also confirms that in south India only after Pulikesin-I (550 C.E.-567 C.E.), the Chalukyas of Vatapi (presently Badami in Karnataka) emerged as a super power, who claimed that their ancestors were from 'Ayodhya' ruling family of Solar race. Dr. Mazumdar further writes to say that in 'Andhra Desha', there were small kingdoms created by 'Ishwakku vanshi' princes from  Ayodhya, after the downfall of Satavahana empire.

Fragment of stone found near Batterappa temple, now preserved in the museum of Kannada Research office, Dharwar, contains inscription dated 610 C.E., wherein the preamble is-"Param-Bhagavatanam Svami-Mahasena-Matngana-Padanuahyatnam-Polekesi-Vallabha." Meaning King Pulikesin I as the performer of a horse sacrifice. From the alphabet and the mention of Vatapi as the victorious capital, it appears probably that the inscription belongs to the reign of Pulikesin II, who established himself at Vatapi(present Badami) after a successful compaign of 'Digvijaya' as recorded in the famous Aihole inscription of 634 C.E.. 

As concluded by scholars like Parjiter and Pulskar, it is well established that some princes from Ayodhya area had migrated to Konkan Desha, after the capital of Ayodhya became deserted, and indeed established small principalities. This study indicates that the ancestors of  Nanyadeva had lived in 'Konkan Desha' for 7/8 generations. The ancestors of Nanyadeva might have even helped King Pulikesin-I (550-567 C.E.) to conquer Vizapur and in creating the capital at Vatapi.


Even in the history of Nepal and the chronicle collected by Shri Shiva Raj Shrestha'Malla', it is more explicit and given the description in the following words-

“Ayodhya nagari ujad bhaiya tesama vasanya manisahar charo tafe badhan gaya, rajavanshaka manusyaharu jun jun thaonma badhan gaya, use use thaonma afna afna purusartha anushar shano thulo rajya sthapit gari vasya. Nidan tinai surya vansha ka kohi manislay Ayodhya bata dakshin ko kokan deshma. Gae kaye din 7/8 pusta samma basechhan.”

(Meaning-"The city of Ayodhya was deserted and the people and the royal men left the place in search of safe places in and around the Deccan plateau. There they, as per their capability, created a few small/big kingdoms. In this a few Suryavanshi kings went to Konkan area of south and created a kingdom and ruled there for 7/8 generations)". 

Therefore, it is well established that some princes from Ayodhya had migrated to south India and indeed had established small kingdoms as described in all the Bhasa Vanshavalis found in Nepal, being the main source of it’s history. This study indicates that the ancestors of King Nanyadeva(The founder of  'Karnat dynasty', and the 'Mul purush' of Nepali Kingdom), had lived in Konkan desha for 7/8 generations before,  again capturing theVideha region in 1097 C.E., by establishing its capital at Simaraongarh(presently Birganj) by defeating King Laxman Sena of Sena dynasty.

Several mention of the Karnatas in Pala inscriptions clearly indicate that they were serving the Pala kings as important officials. The Karnata invasion from the south helped in realization of their ambition of creating their own kingdoms in their ancestral areas. Acha, a feudatory of king Vikramaditya VI, is being quoted by several historians to have conquered large territories for his master. A few historians also opine that Karnatas were merely the results of the revival of the eclipsed Karnata power in Magadha. King Nanyadeva built the fort at Simraongarh (presently Birganj town of Nepal). The Simraongarh pillar inscription and the exact replica of the text preserved in the Nepal Vansavali records states - "King Nanyadeva made this erection in Simha Lagna(early morning) of a Saturday in the month of Shravan, Shukla Paksha seventh day in Swati Nakshatra in the year 1019 Shaka, i.e. on 10th July, 1097 C.E.".  

Dr.Satyaketu Vidyalankar also confirms that the ancestors of Chalukyas of Batapi were from ruling Solar dynasty of Ayodhya. Dr.Dina Nath Verma has studied Chalukyas origin in more detail and after studying the writings of Srinivasacharya Ayengar and Dr.H.C.Roy, has very firmly concluded that the ancestors of Chalukyas of Batapi were definitely from ancient Ayodhya's ruling Solar race, who for some reason or other, first migrated to Nimad(Rajasthan), before coming to Batapi(presently Badami near Bijapur).

According to the "Political History of the Chalukyas of Badami" by Durga Prasad Dikshit in the Nilagunda inscription of King Vikramaditya VI (1076-1126 C.E.), the Chalukyas,  originally hailed from Ayodhya, where fifty nine kings ruled and later sixteen more of this family ruled from south India, where they had migrated. This is also mentioned in "Vikramdevacharita", by his court poet Bilhana, who claimed that the first member of the family ‘Chalukya’ was so named as he was born in the hollow palm of Lord Brahma.

In 'Vikramdevacharita', the writer Bilhana says–"Brahma was once engaged in his meditation, when Indra came to him to complain of the growing godlessness on the earth and begged him to put an end to it by creating a hero, who would be a terror to the evil doers. On hearing this request, the creator directed his looks towards his hollow palms(chuluka) and from it sprang a handsome warrior fit to protect the three worlds. From him descended the Chalukya race of heroes, among whom Harita, grandson of King Harishchandra of Sat Yuga, is reckoned as first progenitor and 'Manavya', who humbled the kings of the earth. The original seat of the Chalukyas was Ayodhya".

F.E.Parjiter had established that the original Puranas like Vayu, Matsya and Vishnu can be the great source of writing history of ancient Indian sub-continent. He has proved beyond doubt that most of the original parts of Puranas written by 'Chhatriya Sutas' are authentic and various stories coined and recordings made by 'Brahmin priests' are mostly fabricated and imaginary. Parjiter had opined that there were several wars between Mandhata’s successors and Pururava-Haihayas. According to Vayu Purana, there is a description of King Harit of Ishwakku race of Ayodhya and as to how his successor (King Bahu) was forced by Haihaya kings of Lunar race (Ila vanshi) to flee to jungles.

According to Vayu and Kurma Purana, King Harit was the grandson of King Harishchandra (Sat yuga) and Parjiter places him on 35th generation after Vivaswayat Manu or 30 generations (or some 500years) earlier than Lord Rama. This name of King Harit is important, as many historians including Dr.R.S.Tripathy are on record to say that the old Chalukya dynasty of Batapi claimed their main lineage from King Harit of pre-historical Ayodhya. It should be noted that the Chalukyas of Kalyani were branched off  from the old Batapi Chalukyas. King Nanyadeva is very firmly believed by some historians to be a commander of Vikramaditya-VI (Kalyani Chalukya emperor), who had attacked north and north-east India and some parts of Nepal.

In the 'Balmiki Ramayana', the Suryavanshi prince Danda, son of Ishwakku, a serial rapist is exiled by his father to the (aranya) forest, presently named "Dandakaranya', where he proceeds to rape his teacher Shukracharya’s daughter Arja. Incensed, Shukracharya cursed Danda-" He and his entire clan perish". Meanwhile, the regent discovers that Arja had conceived from the rape. She was brought to the Suryavanshi capital, Ayodhya, with great honor. She becomes queen and her child, Harit, later ascends the throne.



King Nanyadeva, the founder of ‘KARNAT  DYNASTY’, and also the 'Mul Purush' of the Nepali Kingdom, had his main lineage from King Harit of pre-historical Ayodhya, was a 'Karna Kayastha Kshatriya', which is evident from the book "Maithila Karna Kayasthaka Panjik Sarvekshan" written by Shri Benod Bihari Verma.  King Nanyadeva defeated the last king of Sena Dynasty King Laxman Sena and became the ruler of Mithila with his kingdom at Simraongarh. During the rule of King Nanyadeva, Shridharadasa invited most of his relatives to settle at Mithila in four phases. In first phase his twelve relatives, second phase twenty relatives, third phase thirty relatives and in the fourth phase all the remaining relatives.

After settling at Mithila these Karna Kayasthas were popular as 'Tirhutia Kayasthas'. It is very much evident that from the period of King Nanyadeva till the middle of Oinwar Dynasty, these kayasthas used to have  the surname ‘Thakkar’. The Oinwar kings, did not like their surname similar to the Brahmins, so they changed their surname to Das, Dutta, Dev, Kantha, Nidhi, Mallik, Labh, Chaudhary etc.. Most of their rituals are same as 'Brahmins', but their marriages are mostly in the same 'gotra'.




Nanyadeva (1097-1147 C.E.) obtained the kingdom of Mithila in return for a tribute of Rs.1 Lakh.  With founding of village Koili-Nanhapura(Nanyapura), near Nehra Raghopur, Sakri, Darabhanga his seat of government was later shifted to Sivarampura-Simraon, a village situated in Nepal, 10 kms. north of the Purnahia factory in the Motihari district. He ruled for about 46 years between powerful Gahadwals of Kasi and Senas of Magadh and Bengal. He clashed with King Vijayasena near Supaul and was defeated by him. His sons Gangadeva and Malladeva defeated Vijaysena and captured the town of Malladiha and Gangapur Ranani. Nanyadeva’s minister was Sridharadas, a Karna Kayastha. The two sons of Nanyadeva, Malladeva and Gangadeva seemingly made the Senas move further east as observed by the setting up of village Gangapur Ranani(named after King Gangadeva) in the sub-division Nishanpur Kurha and Maldiha(named after King Malladeva) on the Saharsa-Purnea border. The village Malhad near Supaul is also associated with King Malladeva as well.


King Nanyadeva had come from Batapi(presently Badami in Karnataka) and made his first capital at Koili-Nanhapura(Nanyapura) in Motihari district, which was later shifted to Simraungarh(Birganj). After conquering entire Mithila, he shifted his capital to Kamaladityasthan(Kamladan). Another village named Andharatharhi in Madhubani district is also mentioned to be capital of the Karnats. In the said village, there are six dozen ponds, constitute the beads of a picturesque garland. The ponds are interconnected among themselves and also with the river ‘Sugarve’ for smooth recharging with the flood water. These ponds constructed by Karnat kings make a unique irrigation system and is proving its relevance even today, spanning over around nine centuries.Karnat Dynasty rulers were 'Karna Kayasthas', as the name formed 'Karnat'. Several historians opine that as these warriors came from Karnataka, so the dynasty was called "Karnat Dynasty".

Karnat dynasty founder Nanyadeva, apart from being a great warrior, he also had keen interest in music.He named himself ‘Mithileshvara’ in his work on music-‘Saraswati Hridayalankar’. He classified and analysed Ragas and opines 'Madhya laya' is chosen for ‘Hasya Ras’ and ‘Shringar Ras’, 'Bilambit' is chosen for ‘Karun Ras’ and 'Drut" for 'Veer', 'Rodra', 'Advut' and 'Bhayanak Rasas’. His treaty on music ‘Saraswati Hridayalankar’, is preserved in the Bhandarkar Research Institute in Pune. As per the book "Abhinavagupta-An Historical and Philosophical Study" by K.C.Pandey on page 121-123, Nanyadeva also mastered 'Natya Sastra'. Abhinavagupta in his commentary on Bharata's Natya Sastra, refers to King Nanyadeva and quotes from his 'Bharatabhasya', a commentary on the Natya Sastra, as follows:-
  • "Uktam Nanyadevena sva Bharatabhasye-'Atra varnasubdena gitirabhidhiyate naksaravisesaha;
  •   napi sadjadisaptasvarah padagrame tvaniyamadeva;
  •   svecchaya prayujyante sadjadis varantanam apya;
  •   vizesena vavaronadidharmanam pratyeva samupa lambhate;
  •   Ato verna eva gitirityavasthitam, sopi caturdha maga dhyudih."

An account of Nanya's commentary on Bharata's Natya Sastra (Chs. XXVII to XXXIV, dealing with music), the author gives his identity as:-

01. Mahasamantadhipati-dharmavaloka-Sriman Nanyapati
02. Mithilesvara
03. Karnatakulabhusana
04. Dharmadharabhupati
05. Rajnarayana
06. Nrpamalla
07. Mohanmurari
08. Pratyagravanipati
09. Extinguisher of the fame of the king of Malwa
10. Conqueror of the heroes of Sauvira 
11. Breaker of the powers of Vanga and Gauda.    

Gangadeva, Narsinhdeva, Shankersinghdeva and Harisinghdeva followed King Nanyadeva. In them King Harisinghdeva is the most famous. He was instrumental in initiating and implementing 'Panji Vyavastha' in Maithil Brahmins and Karna Kayasthas. He was also great patron of art and literature. In the court of King Harisinghdeva, the royal priest was Pundit Kameshwar Thakur, the author of ‘Varna Ratnakara’, which is considered to be the first prose and encyclopedia in any north Indian language. Pundit Kameshwar Thakur later became founder of the Oinwar Dynasty kings from 1356 to 1526 C.E., and then after, with a period of anarchy from 1527 to 1576 C.E., the 'Kandavala' Dynasty ruled Mithila from 1577 to 1947 C.E.

Karnat dynasty kings are known as forgotten kings of Mithila, so I like to add the following:- The ancestors of King Nanyadeva were from the ruling solar race of Ayodhya, who had gone to konkan (south west coast of Maharashtra) adjoining north-west Karnataka near Batapi, the capital of ancient Chalukyas and also Tulajapur- Sholapur in Nimad (country of ancient Rajasthan- central India) in the pre-historic  times. King Nanyadeva came to Delhi at the age of 20 years with his father, mother, and wife. He served the king of Delhi for 5/7 years. King Nanyadeva was born in 1057 C.E. and died in 1147 C.E. As per Dr. Satyaketu Vidyalankar, one King Chandra Dev seized power in Kannauj in 1080 C.E. Nanyadeva served king Chandra Dev for 5/7 years and after the death of his father, mother and wife he wondered Ayodhya like a Fakir and was there for nearly seven years. Around 1093 C.E., Nanyadeva had entered Mithila and had first established his capital in Nanapura in Champaran district and then shifted to Simraungarh(Birganj). Dr. Satyaketu Vidyalankar also confirms that Indraprastha (Delhi) was under the rule of King Chandra Dev Gahadwal. Dr. Vidyalankar further writes that the grand son of King Chandra Dev, King Govind Chandra(1114-1154 C.E.), who ruled the area of Delhi in the west and Behar in the east, had very cordial relationship with King Nanyadeva and his sons. Actually because of the favours from Govind Chandra, Nanyadeva and his sons had sustained their hold in Mithila. Besides this there are other indications, which show that the sons and grandsons of King Nanyadeva were in very good terms with Gahadwal kings of Kannauj, who were mostly living in Kashi. Actually, the elder son of King Nanyadeva, Malladeva had accepted to serve Gahadwal king Jaya Chandra.


During the rule of King Nanyadeva, Mithila had been an important center of music. Nanyadeva is credited with having developed popular ragas and is believed to have been the inspirer of the Mithila School of Music, which assumed a new form after being influenced by Jayadeva of "Geet-Govind" fame. Nanyadeva was also a writer of Dramaturgy, as he wrote an exhaustive commentary on Bharata's 'Natya-Shashtra'. He holds that a dominant feeling or emotion becomes a sentiment, when it is transferred into an object of enjoyment. His 'Abhinavabharati' is an epoch making contribution as it covers the whole ground connected with drama. 


The last ruler of Karnat dynasty King Harisimhadeva was also a very prominent ruler and  was a great patron of art and letter. In his reign flourished not only Jyotirishwar and Umapati but also a host of other poets, scholars and philosophers. Shankardutta, a karna kayastha, was a devout 'Vaishnava' and a renowned scholar and a poet. Bodhidasa, another karna kayastha, was a poet and was also mentioned in the famous “Purushpariksha”.

“Shake yugma gunaki sammit vare bhoopal chooramani,
Shri machhri Harisimhadeva vijayee panji prabandhah kritah ;
Tasmatu karna beejkalitan sudvishwan chakrepura,
Kayastha mati pradastha guninang Shree Shakardutta bhan.”

It means that Raja Harisimhadeva ordered Shankardutta of Mul-Sarisab in 1310 C.E. for 'Panji Prabandha'. 'Panji Prabandha' was written during 1310-1314 C.E., then it was handed over to his nephew Gunapati Dutta(Mul-Mohinvar-san-Laduari dera). So his clan is known as ‘Panjikars’.

“Shake yugma gunaki sammit vare bhoopal chooramani,
Tasmata karna beejkalitan kayastha panji prabandha,
Krita tasmata mantra guneena Shree Gunapati duttavan.”                  

From 1326-1353 C.E., Mithila, was attacked several times by Ghiasuddin Tughlaq, and was totally in a state of anarchy, most of the books and testimonials were burnt or destroyed, it has been mentioned that the library of  Nalanda University was burning for around three months,  so in 1352 C.E. the work of copying the 'Panji Prabandh' was given to Shree Shambhudutta Mallik, son of Shree Shankardutta Mallik.

Taranand Mishra has written about a royal priest by the name of Sripati/Sridhar (Compiler of Sadhuktikarnamrit), who was not only connected with Gahadwal king Govind Chandra, but also served as the royal priest of King Nanyadeva.Therefore, the ‘root’ of Karnat dynasty kings of Mithila and their key supporters like Acharyas, Hadas, Rathauds, Karna Kayasthas, and Joshis were in Konkan, Rajasthan, Bundelkhand and Himachal Garhwal. An important clue is found in a historical statement saying that-“Only after the death of Kalachuri king Karna, Nanyadeva could become the ruler of Mithila. According to Dr. Vidyalankar, Chedi(Kalachuri Karna) king died in 1093 C.E. His son, who had attacked 'Mithila' repeatedly had been in command already, before his father’s death. Kaibrata revolt also had taken place during that time, which has weakened Pala rulers over Mithila and north Behar, which definitely helped Nanyadeva to take over the control of Mithila.
              
The script of Andharatharhi inscription of Sridhardasa in Maithili and an inscription in Maithili script of the time of King Akbar has recently been discovered from the Godda subdivision of the district of Santhal Pargana.


74 comments:

  1. It has to be read with the chronicle of Shri Shiv Raj Shresth Malla on the history of Nepal

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What ever information I have found is right here and source link :- https://www.museumassociation.org.np/images/simroungadh.jpg

      गिरीश गिरी, काठमाडौं, असार ३
      20160522

      Delete
    2. https://setopati.com/social/161930
      गिरीश गिरी, काठमाडौं, असार ३
      20160522

      पुरातात्विक महत्वको स्थानमा धमाधम माछापोखरी खन्न थालेपछि सिम्रौनगढ ध्वस्त हुँदै गएको सरोकारवालाहरूले बताएका छन्। यसरी खनिएका स्थानमा धमाधम महत्वपूर्ण मूर्ति र शिलालेखसमेत एक्सकाभेटर (फ्रन्ट लोडर) (फ्रन्ट लोडर) ले टुक्राएकै अवस्थामा भेटिन थालेको छ।

      ‘कर्णाटवंशीय राजा लखेटिएर काठमाडौं आएपछिको आठ सय वर्षसम्म पनि सिम्रौनगढ खासै विथोलिएको थिएन,’ मार्टिन चौतारीमा शुक्रबार स्थानीय भरत साहले भने, ‘बितेको आठ महिनामा त्यो स्थानको पुरातात्विक महत्वलाई ध्वस्त पार्नेगरी पोखरी खन्ने काम भएको छ।’

      समाजशास्त्रका अध्येता साह तराइ मधेस राष्ट्रिय परिषदका संयोजकसमेत हुन्। उनले गत महिना सिम्रौनगढमा यही विषयलाई लिएर नगरपालिकाको सहयोगमा सम्मेलनसमेत गराएका थिए।

      सिम्रौनगढ नगरपालिकाका प्रमुख विजयशंकर यादवका अनुसार त्यो क्षेत्रमा यतिबेला झण्डै डेढ सयवटा पोखरी छन् र प्रायः सबै केही महिनायता खनिएका हुन्। जबकि त्यो क्षेत्रमा तीन फिटभन्दा गहिरो खन्नेबित्तिकै पुरातात्विक महत्वका वस्तु फेलापर्ने गरेका छन्।

      Delete
  2. Did you mean that chalukya of batapi rulers were karna kayasthas?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes,this has been given with proof in the book,"Maithili Karna Kayasthak Panjik Sarvekshan"by Major Benod Bihari Verma.

      Delete
    2. Yes we karn kayastha have root with badami

      Delete
    3. Shri dhar das mool purush of karn kayastha was from naragwali village. But naragwali village not belongs to karnatka. Presently this village in pakistan :-

      Nārangwali in Punjab is located in Pakistan about 144 mi (or 232 km) south-east of Islamabad, the country's capital town.

      Current time in Nārangwali is now 10:11 AM (Saturday). The local timezone is named Asia / Karachi with an UTC offset of 5 hours. We know of 9 airports close to Nārangwali, of which two are larger airports. The closest airport in Pakistan is Sialkot Airport in a distance of 32 mi (or 51 km), North-West. Besides the airports, there are other travel options available (check left side).

      There are two Unesco world heritage sites nearby. The closest heritage site in Pakistan is Fort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore in a distance of 51 mi (or 81 km), South-West.

      While being here, you might want to pay a visit to some of the following locations: Narowal, Sialkot, Gujranwala, Gujrat and Lahore. To further explore this place, just scroll down and browse the available info.

      Delete
    4. Dear Mr. Unknown,
      To my knowledge,Sridhardasa,the prime minister of King Nanyadeva(1097-1143 AD) was a Karna Kayastha,correct,but was not the mool purush of Karna Kayasthas.He was the compiler of 'Sadhuktikarnamrit'and the writer of 'Nyaya Kandili'. Secondly, there can be several similar names and places.
      Thanks and regards,

      Delete
    5. Then who was mool purush of Karna kayastha nanyadev or shridhar das.

      Delete
    6. I think it will help you

      https://books.google.co.in/books?id=XfoDGECaveMC&pg=PT107&lpg=PT107&dq=karn+kayastha+mool&source=bl&ots=ERtsp7A4mF&sig=ACfU3U3_y4-jwr43Y4b75ey4RN9fbGzlvg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi96rnFn5bpAhWQ6nMBHcdABF04HhDoATAHegQICRAB#v=onepage&q=karn%20kayastha%20mool&f=false

      Delete
    7. As per my search and Mr. CPN Sinha,Ratnadeva is the "Mul Purush "of Karna Kayasthas.

      Delete
    8. But Ratna Deva was from kalchuri dynasty. It means all karn kayasthas are haihai vanshi. Ummmm I don't think so. Lot of link prove that karn surname adopted by those who are writers in king's court.may be they belongs to brahmin or kshtriya caste.

      Delete

    9. First,thanks for your interest and observation,I do not know that Ratnadeva was from kalchuri dynasty,kindly share if you have a valid proof.I only understand from the book of Prof. CPN Sinha,that Ratnadeva was one among the first twelve persons brought from Karnataka during the establishment of his Karnat dynasty.Again 'Karna' were all that persons,who were writers not a surname.

      Delete
    10. The problem is that sir Sen dynasty rulers were also from kayastha origin and also claim they were all from karnatak.gauda kayastha or sen
      kayastha of Bengal.

      Delete
    11. Kindly read in Padma Purana, Uttar Khand, 'Kayasthanangsamutpatti',there are 63 shlokas detailing the origin of Chitragupta Maharaj, his marriage(2) and the 12 sons and their upbringing by different sages. The eighth son was given by Lord Bramha to Dalabhya Rishi, who took him Durlalak desha i.e. south of Vindhya range, now Karnataka. These all are known as Dalabhya Gaud Kayasthas. Further, the Pal dynasty(750 AD- 1448 AD), Sen dynasty and Chalukya dynasty , all are the same Dalabhya Gauda Kayasthas from Karnataka as per my knowledge and belief.Thanks for following my blog,God bless you!

      Delete
    12. Sir, can you please provide this book to me.

      Delete
    13. As my blog still have not been published, so Iam unable to provide you. Anyway it is always available on Google, please help yourself, thanks.

      Delete
  3. Yes we karna kayastha have root from chalukya vansh of badami

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I will be grateful, if you become known from being unknown,to strengthen me.During 1098 AD,Maharaj Nanya Dev started bringing families of Karna Kayasthas, first his relatives, from Badami.The first was 'Bear Vansh".Coincidently I belong to this Vansh and my mool is "Garh Bear san Godhiary Dera".Thanks

      Delete
    2. all kayastha are brahmin and we are all from brahmin origin share with kayasth friends and social media to aware all kayastha friends
      Mana Sanskriti (Our Culture) (https://www.vepachedu.org/manasanskriti/Brahmins.html)

      Delete
    3. I am also a karn kayastha with the same mool bear sang pathari dera baas gonoun ..Why your title Singh..

      Delete
    4. Thanks and regards for having interest in me and my work. We were given this title in 1725 AD by the Muslim ruler King Farukhsiyar, kindly see the preface of my blog "Bhor sa sanjh tak", wherein the 'munadi'in persian and translated in 'kaithi'is given as proof.Thanks again.

      Delete
    5. https://setopati.com/social/161930
      गिरीश गिरी, काठमाडौं, असार ३
      20160522

      पुरातात्विक महत्वको स्थानमा धमाधम माछापोखरी खन्न थालेपछि सिम्रौनगढ ध्वस्त हुँदै गएको सरोकारवालाहरूले बताएका छन्। यसरी खनिएका स्थानमा धमाधम महत्वपूर्ण मूर्ति र शिलालेखसमेत एक्सकाभेटर (फ्रन्ट लोडर) (फ्रन्ट लोडर) ले टुक्राएकै अवस्थामा भेटिन थालेको छ।

      ‘कर्णाटवंशीय राजा लखेटिएर काठमाडौं आएपछिको आठ सय वर्षसम्म पनि सिम्रौनगढ खासै विथोलिएको थिएन,’ मार्टिन चौतारीमा शुक्रबार स्थानीय भरत साहले भने, ‘बितेको आठ महिनामा त्यो स्थानको पुरातात्विक महत्वलाई ध्वस्त पार्नेगरी पोखरी खन्ने काम भएको छ।’

      समाजशास्त्रका अध्येता साह तराइ मधेस राष्ट्रिय परिषदका संयोजकसमेत हुन्। उनले गत महिना सिम्रौनगढमा यही विषयलाई लिएर नगरपालिकाको सहयोगमा सम्मेलनसमेत गराएका थिए।

      सिम्रौनगढ नगरपालिकाका प्रमुख विजयशंकर यादवका अनुसार त्यो क्षेत्रमा यतिबेला झण्डै डेढ सयवटा पोखरी छन् र प्रायः सबै केही महिनायता खनिएका हुन्। जबकि त्यो क्षेत्रमा तीन फिटभन्दा गहिरो खन्नेबित्तिकै पुरातात्विक महत्वका वस्तु फेलापर्ने गरेका छन्।

      Delete
  4. all kayastha are brahmin and we are all from brahmin origin share with kayasth friends and social media to aware all kayastha friends
    Mana Sanskriti (Our Culture)

    https://www.vepachedu.org/manasanskriti/Brahmins.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. I very much agree with you and hasten to add that this fact is very clearly mentioned in my blog with facts.

    ReplyDelete
  6. yes sir kayasthas were brahmins the name kayastha and rajput came to be used around mughal era before that kayasthas were called brahmins who had knowledge of both scriptures and arms like bhumihar even history says chalukyas were brahmins who took to arms and administration but actually they were kayasthas

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks for following my blog, I also request you to please correct me immediately,if I have written something without proof or relevence.Thanks again...

    ReplyDelete
  8. thank you for this relevent information.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kindly go through the entire book and any thing ,if you find wrong or absurd, please advise me for genuine corrections. God bless you

      Delete
  9. Nanyadev Parmar was not Karna Kayastha, please get true information before writing history.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. nanyadeva was may be from parmara but the fact is karn kayasthas of bihar basically belongs to karnat dynasty.

      Delete
    2. who says nanyadeva was parmara. karnat dynasty came from sen dynasty. he was sen vanshi all sen dynasty denoted as karnataka dynasty.go and read mithila panjik sarvekshan.

      Delete
    3. Nanyadev was not a Parmar. No contemporary inscription or source calls him a rajput or even a Parmar. The name Karnata clearly proves his Karana origins.

      Delete
    4. Inscription says he was karn kayasth kshtriya
      https://setopati.com/social/161930
      गिरीश गिरी, काठमाडौं, असार ३
      20160522

      पुरातात्विक महत्वको स्थानमा धमाधम माछापोखरी खन्न थालेपछि सिम्रौनगढ ध्वस्त हुँदै गएको सरोकारवालाहरूले बताएका छन्। यसरी खनिएका स्थानमा धमाधम महत्वपूर्ण मूर्ति र शिलालेखसमेत एक्सकाभेटर (फ्रन्ट लोडर) (फ्रन्ट लोडर) ले टुक्राएकै अवस्थामा भेटिन थालेको छ।

      ‘कर्णाटवंशीय राजा लखेटिएर काठमाडौं आएपछिको आठ सय वर्षसम्म पनि सिम्रौनगढ खासै विथोलिएको थिएन,’ मार्टिन चौतारीमा शुक्रबार स्थानीय भरत साहले भने, ‘बितेको आठ महिनामा त्यो स्थानको पुरातात्विक महत्वलाई ध्वस्त पार्नेगरी पोखरी खन्ने काम भएको छ।’

      समाजशास्त्रका अध्येता साह तराइ मधेस राष्ट्रिय परिषदका संयोजकसमेत हुन्। उनले गत महिना सिम्रौनगढमा यही विषयलाई लिएर नगरपालिकाको सहयोगमा सम्मेलनसमेत गराएका थिए।

      सिम्रौनगढ नगरपालिकाका प्रमुख विजयशंकर यादवका अनुसार त्यो क्षेत्रमा यतिबेला झण्डै डेढ सयवटा पोखरी छन् र प्रायः सबै केही महिनायता खनिएका हुन्। जबकि त्यो क्षेत्रमा तीन फिटभन्दा गहिरो खन्नेबित्तिकै पुरातात्विक महत्वका वस्तु फेलापर्ने गरेका छन्।

      Delete
    5. lets imagine for a while that nanyadev was a parmar which is a clan of rajput
      but it may be known to you that king harisimha dev of karnat dynasty introduced panji paddhiti i.e vanshavali records for brahmins and karna kayasthas.....if the dyansty was of rajputs that why didn't they introduce the vanshavali records for themselves? No any king will find it boring and introduce such things for other castes and not for his caste
      this clearly indicates that he was either a maothili brahmin or karna kayastha but the kings were migrants and among the two only karn kayastha was a migrant not bhramins which means the kings were karna kayastahs...the introduced panji paddhiti for their vansha and for brahmins as they were superior

      Delete
    6. Thanks, for following my blog. Yes, your point is logical. With the same logic Dr. Benod Bihari Verma mentioned King Nanyadeva , the Karna Kayastha ruler, in his book "Maithili Karna Kayasthak Panjik Sarvekshan".

      Delete
  10. Nanyadev Karnatavanshi was a Kshatriya Please do not tamper with the truth of history

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. karnat dynasty was kyastha dynasty go and read mithila panjik sarvekshan.

      Delete
    2. so u think kayastha is a vaishyan? they are brahmkshatriya having authority to read scriptures and take arms and rule unfortunately they lost their identity till medival period but due to their writing skills that in demand n persian language learning they got eminent positions in mughal courts so english faield to understand in which varna do they lie

      Delete
    3. I do not think with a very vivid proof exactly during 183 BC , i.e. the vedic age it was clearly stated in "Manu Smriti" that Karna Kyasthas are Bratya Khatriyas again the Dwija, where lies any doubt or suspicion?

      Delete
    4. Who said Nanyadev wasn't a Kshatriya? Obviously being Karana Kayastha means being a Kshatriya.

      Delete
    5. Mr. Deshmukh, I do agree with you in totality. In "Manu Smriti" a shloka says, the Karana being Bratya Kshatriya. Thanks for your comment.

      Delete
  11. Writers should be transparent. Do not harm society by giving false information.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I did not say about Nanyadev Parmar, I did write about The founder king of Karnat dynasty "Nanyadev", who is invariably mentioned by most of the noted historians as the forgotten king of Mithila, with his capital at Simraongarh(Birganj).Please read the book"Maithil Karna Kayasthak Panjik Sarvekshan" by Shri Benod Behari Verma and then come forward with your corrected information. Please also come up with your originality(not unknown), so that I can enlighten you with the correct history.Thanks..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nanyadeva (IAST: Nānyadev[1]) was the founder of Tirhut Kingdom[2] and the first king[3] of Karnata dynasty.[4] He was the ancestor of Harisimhadeva. He established his capital in Simraungadh and ruled the greater Mithila region for 50 years.[5] He is known for his generosity, courage, and patronage of scholars.[6] He was from Karna Kayastha Kshatriya Kula and began to rule Mithila from Simraungadh in 1097 CE. The stone inscription found at Simraongarh and Nepālavaṃśāvalī[7] clearly states that he made an erection in a Singha Lagna of a Saturday in a Sravana, the tithi being Sukla seven and the Naksatara Svati in the year 1019 Shaka (July 10, 1097 AD).[8][9]

      Nanyadeva
      King of Mithila
      King of Tirhut
      Reign
      1097–1147 CE
      Predecessor
      Established
      Successor
      Malladeva
      Died
      Simraungadh
      House
      Karnata dynasty

      Delete
    2. Yes, I very much agree with you and wish to quote the book "the forgotten kings of Mithila" by Shri CPN Sinha.
      Thanks and regards

      Delete
    3. Thanka a lot for providing me such priceless information.Godf bless you.

      Delete
  13. Shivnath Sir,

    What makes you so sure of King Nanyadeva arriving from Vatapi and not from Manyakheta (then capital city of western Chalukya empire) ? Because Vatapi was almost abandoned in mid eleventh century.

    ReplyDelete
  14. King Nanyadeva , in his book on music , "Saraswati Hridayalankar" , original preserved at Bhadarkar Institute Library at Pune, has himself mentioned in the preface that he is from 'Chalukya Vansha' connected with King Vikramaditya VI , of Chalukya's of Batapi(Presently Badami).

    ReplyDelete
  15. नमस्कार! अपने परिश्रम त' बहुत कयल। एहि लेल अपने नमस्य छी। बिनु कोनो कमेंट कयने हमर विनम्र अनुरोध जे एक बेर 'सुलतानपुर सौरभ' अवश्य देखि ली। बहुत भ्रम केर निराकरण उचित। पोथी अमेज़न पर उपलब्ध अछि। सादर।

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Namaskar Dr. Ranganadhaji,
      I feel delighted as a scholar of your cadre has gone thru' my work. I will certainly read the book "Sultanpur Saurav" within a week and revert to you. I will be very happy to note any of my omission and commission as I think to publish my search in the near future.

      Delete
    2. Dr. Ranganadhji,
      Kindly send me the link for "Sultanpur Saurabh", as I am not getting it on Amazon. Thanks and regards.

      Delete
  16. नमस्कार! खेद जे 'सुलतानपुर सौरभ' केर साॅफ्ट कापी अखन उपलब्ध नहि अछि। उपलब्ध होइत मातर हम अपने कें पठायब। ई हमर गाम सुलतानपुर पर एकटा छोटछीन प्रयास अछि जाहि मे हम मैथिल करण कायस्थक कर्णाटक सँ कथित आव्रजन केर लघु मीमांसा करबाक प्रयास कयलहु। बंगलुरू आ बीदर क्षेत्र क बहुत गामक भ्रमण कयलहु मुदा हमरा एकटा परिवार एहन नहि भेटल जे भगवान् चित्रगुप्त क नाम तक सुनने हो। खैर! अशोक कुमार वर्मा जी क नीक पोथी 'कायस्थों की सामाजिक पृष्ठभूमि' मे सेहो कायस्थ विषयक विस्तृत विचार भेल अछि। अवसर हो त' देखल जा सकैछ। सादर!🙏🙏

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dr. Ranganathji,
      Thanks for your prompt reply. I have purchased your book thru' Amazon Prime yesterday and they have promised to deliver the book by 18th of this month. I have read the book of Ashok Kumar Verma. Truly speaking for the last five years I am only searching things connected with Kayasthas and my origin with valid proof i.e. the Shilalekh, manuscripts, copper plates and the Vanshavalis and Panji created in early 14 th century. The ancient quotes are as per our scriptures.Thanks again and regards.

      Delete
  17. जी नमस्कार!
    एकटा एहन शिलालेख आइ धरि नहि भेटल अछि जे मैथिल करण कायस्थ कें कर्णाट सँ मिथिला अयबाक घोषणा करैत हो वा नान्यदेव कें कायस्थ कहैत हो। श्रीधर लक्ष्मण सेन केर अंत समय 1205-6 ई.मे सदुक्तिकर्णामृत ग्रंथ पूरा कयलनि, ई सदुक्तिकर्णामृत मे स्पष्ट रूप सँ उल्लिखित अछि। न्याय कन्दली श्रीधर दासक नहि श्रीधर भट्ट क रचना अछि। एकर अन्त मे कहैत छथि-
    त्र्यधिक दशोत्तर नवशतशाकब्दे न्याय कन्दली रचिता
    श्री पाण्डुदासयाचित भट्टश्री श्रीधरेणेयम्
    अर्थात् शकाब्द 913 मे श्री पाण्डु दासक याचना पर भट्टश्री श्रीधर न्याय कन्दली क रचना कयलनि। 991 ई. मे अपना सभक श्रीधर दासक कतहु अस्तित्व नहि छल। अपने स्वयं बहुपठित शोध विद्वान् छी। हम की कही? सादर

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Kshemendraji,
      Dr. Ranganathji has written his comments in Maithili language, which states that-"Till date there is not a single manuscript confirming the settlement of Karna Kayasthas in Mithila from Karnataka nor King Nanyadeva being a Karna Kayastha. Shridhar completed his "Sadhuktikarnamrita" in the last days of the rule of King Lakshmisena, i.e. 1205-1206 AD."Nyayakandli" is written by Shridhar Bhatta not Shridhardasa. On the concluding part of his book, he has mentioned that on the request of Shree Pandudasa he has written this book in 913 AD."
      Thanks and regards for following my blog.

      Delete
    2. Quite clearly the Brahmin scholars and the modern day brahmin historians (especially Maithil brahmin) are endowed with this task of hiding the truth and imposing lies upon public conscience. The reason why they do it primarily is because they were the reason why the karnatas were dispossesed of their legitimate right to rule and their kingdom was destroyed by the tughlaks through brahmin conspiracies. The weirdest of all is a fundamental question - how did a brahmin become the ruler of mithila ? How did they take over the title - thakur ? Aren't brahmins custodians of knowledge and education ?

      Never expect a brahmin blood (whatever be his profession) to give you the truth for it is his forefathers who are responsible for the desecration of legitimacy of many kshatriya blood lines.

      Anyways - All karna kayasthas are kshatriyas by blood and true rulers of mithila by birth.

      Shantnu Karna

      Delete
    3. I think a better topic to start a debate is, the word root karna (whether it refers to karnataka or the writer caste karnam) and its relation with the karna kayasthas of bihar ? how did the karnas of bihar get an add on title - kayastha and got assimilated in the otherwise 12 clan broad kayastha community of north india ? what is the cultural relation and genetic proximity of the karnas of bihar and orissa ? why did un unbroken patrilineal chain of the brahmins get to decide who is a kshatriya and who is not ? How did the brahmin cabale decide overnight which tribes to assimilate in the indic society as Hindus , or exhalt as rajputs and which communites to be pushed to the margins of the society ?

      Let's all accept the fact that the karnas are kshatriyas by blood and have only had their existence tainted by brahmin hegemony due to jealousy and pushed to the kayastha social order in the food chain pyramid ruled by the brahmins.

      Delete
    4. Dear Shantnu,
      Hope you & family to be hale and hearty. Sorry, for responding late as I was in Kolkata for refurnishing of my house there.
      Well, for the first topic of 12.46 a.m., your assertions are in line with the findings of these days i.e. the forgotten rulers of Mithila-Karnat dynasty- please see chapter-IV of my blog.
      For the second topic of 5.47 a.m., I wish to state that caste Karna is mentioned even in Manu Smriti as is detailed in my blog. Again there are two versions of this sub-caste's settlement- i) They were ordered by Lord Chitragupta to settle around Karnali river(Nepal), which enters in India as Ghaghara river around Ayodhya; ii) Lord Brahma told Rishi Dalabhya to upbring him in his ashram at Karnali on the banks of Narmada.
      The genetic proximity of the Karnas of Bihar and Orissa, my studies envisions the Kalinga war by Great Ashoka, wherein around three lac people were killed and to fill the gap he brought One lac Karnas from Magadh. I did not wish to opine for the caste heirarchy in India. Though regarding the varna of Chitraguptiya Kayasthas, I have very clearly stated the proofs of their being the Kshatriya in my first chapter of the blog.
      Thanks and regards.

      Delete
    5. Added to the first comment's reply, it is understandable but abortive tendency to perceive the actual from the arbitrary point of Brahmanic doctrine.

      Delete
  18. Dr. Ranganathji,
    Thanks for your reply and findings, at this juncture I will add that from tenth century A.D. to 13th century A.D., I came across three Sridhar/Shridharadasa/Sridhar Bhat. One of them, whose father was Pandu Das and both of them were in very senior ministerial position with King Laxman Sena of Banga desha.
    These days my daughter with her two young ones are staying with us. Kindly bear with me I will give you all the details with proof by th9is week end.
    Thanks and regards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dr. Ranganathji,
      I received your book "Sultanpur Saurabh" thru' Amazon and immediately read it. I was really enlightened on Sridhardasa and will certainly correct my findings by mentioning your research work. Thanks for your suggestion and cooperation.
      Thanks again and all good wishes in this Navaratri.

      Delete
  19. 🙏🙏विजया दशमी पर अपने सन विश्रुत विद्वान् कें नमस्कार करैत मोन मुदित अछि । 🙏🙏

    ReplyDelete
  20. Thanks and my best of compliments for the distinction conferred on you recently and on the Vijaya Dashami day. Let the Almighty bless you with all the best in life.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Sir in sultan pur daurav are we get any clue about karn kayastha relation with kshtriya varna.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Dear Unknown,
    Yes,pl. see page no.20 of the book.

    ReplyDelete
  23. i am a maithil karna kayastha with origins of my ancestors in tektar on my fathers side and sitamarhi on my mothers side.

    ReplyDelete
  24. i want to connect with you over either email : shantnudas.official@gmail.com or on whatsapp : +91-8588868227

    please do reach out i want to dig deep and understand my roots.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Shantnudas,
      Thanks for taking interest in my blog. You can jolly well ask me any of your curiosity or difference of opinion on the blog itself, otherwise my email is 'shivnath1650@gmail.com'.
      Thanks and regards.

      Delete
  25. सामान्यतः कहा जाता है कि जो कायस्थ कर्णाटक(एवं/या दक्षिण भारत) से आए वे कर्ण या करण कायस्थ कहलाए। गोविंद झा ने कर्ण कायस्थों की उत्पत्ति को इससे भिन्न माना है।उन्होंने कर्ण शब्द को करण माना है जिसका अर्थ होता है "कचहरी"।अर्थात कचहरी में कार्य करने वाले कायस्थगण करण/कर्ण कायस्थ कहलाए (गोविंद झा, अतीतालोक, पृ.28)।कचहरी शब्द एक व्यापक संदर्भ में प्रयुक्त होता है।राजकीय उच्चतम न्यायालय से लेकर जमीन्दारों और छोटे बड़े भूपतियों की जो भूसम्पदा विभिन्न गाँवों में होती थीं उसकी देख रेख हेतु उन गाँवों में उनके घरों को कचहरी कहा जाता था।प्रत्येक ऐसे स्थान पर अथवा अधिकांश ऐसे स्थानों पर आय व्यय आदि का हिसाब रखने के लिए कायस्थगण नियुक्त होते थे।

    मिथिला दर्पण के अनुसार जो कायस्थ कर्णाटक के जिस गाँव से आए वही उनका मूल हुआ (पृ.226-28)। लेकिन प्रस्तुत लेखक इस मत से सहमत नहीं है क्योंकि उनके मूलों में कई ऐसे नाम हैं जिस नाम के गाँव मिथिला में भी पाए जाते हैं। यथा, बलाइन, केउटी, बनौली, पोखराम, सीबा, अहपुर, खड़का, गंगौली, छतवन, झंझारपुर, तेघरा, दीप, नवहथ, परसा, पिपरा, पिपरौनी, बड़ियाम (बढ़ियाम?),बिहनगर, बेता, भिट्ठी, मझौरा, महिसी, राघोपुर, लवानी, लोआम, सिमरी, सुपौल, सोनबेहट, सोहराय, हाटी, हावी इत्यादि।

    मैथिल ब्राह्मणों और कर्ण कायस्थों के समान मूलों का उल्लेख करते हुए विनोद बिहारी वर्मा ने ऐसे 23 मूलों का वर्णन किया है ( मैथिल करण कायस्थक पाँजिक सर्वेक्षण, पृ.49 )।

    लेकिन इस आधार पर करण कायस्थों की कर्णाट उत्पत्ति संबंधी मान्यता को सर्वथा अस्वीकृत नहीं किया जा सकता है। कर्ण कायस्थों के अधिकांश मूल मैथिल या मिथिला उत्पत्ति के नहीं कहे जा सकते हैं। उन गैर मैथिल उत्पत्ति वाले मूलों में सभी को कर्णाट या दक्षिण भारतीय उत्पत्ति पर संदेह व्यक्त किया जा सकता है।

    जहाँ तक कर्णाट उत्पत्ति का प्रश्न है उस पर आपत्ति की जा सकती है। मिथिला दर्पण के अनुसार नान्यदेव के मंत्री श्रीधर का दूसरा नाम लक्ष्मीकर था जो बलाइन मूल के संस्थापक भी थे। असमिया जनश्रुति के अनुसार बलाइन मूल के लक्ष्मीकर ठक्कुर प्रसिद्ध श्रीधर के अति अति वृद्ध प्रपितामह टंकपाणिपाल वंशी राजा धर्मपाल के आश्रित थे। टंकपाणि के पिता का नाम मंग्यदास था। धर्मपाल ने टंकपाणि को तीरभुक्ति का "प्रधान लेख्य"नियुक्त किया। तिब्बती स्रोत के अनुसार टंकपाणि के पुत्र चक्रपाणि एक साधक थे। श्रीधर के पिता राज्यधर असमिया जनश्रुति के अनुसार पालवंश की शक्ति क्षीण होने पर कूच बिहार के स्वतंत्र शासक बन गए। राज्यधर के बाद उनके पुत्र श्रीधर को कामरूप के के राजा ब्रह्मपाल ने "सामन्त राजा" की उपाधि दी।

    मिथिला दर्पण ने इसी श्रीधर (लक्ष्मीकर) के नान्यदेव के साथ कर्णाटक से आगमन, उनका मंत्री और उनके कर्णाट गाँव बलाइन के नाम पर बलाइन मूल का संस्थापक कहा है। कुछ अन्य के अनुसार बलाइन मूल के संस्थापक श्रीधर प्रसिद्ध लक्ष्मीकर नान्यदेव से तीन पीढ़ी ऊपर हुए। उनके प्रपौत्र देवधर भी श्रीधर नाम से ज्ञात थे अतः वही नान्यदेव के मंत्री रहे होंगे। इस आलोक मेबलाइन को कर्णाटक से जोड़ना उपयुक्त नहीं होगा जबकि श्रीधर (लक्ष्मीकर)से सात पीढ़ी ऊपर के मंग्यदास असमिया जनश्रुति में मैथिल माने जाते हैं और उनके वंशज असम, बंगाल और मिथिला में कहे जाते हैं।

    ReplyDelete
  26. Kayasthon se judi kuch rochak itihaas
    https://books.google.co.in/books?id=XfoDGECaveMC&pg=PA19&lpg=PA19&dq=%E0%A4%B2%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%B0+%E0%A4%A0%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B0&source=bl&ots=ESpsm6s6lD&sig=ACfU3U3FVEYSZfPwoksoM-H-1D9OWZRN9g&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj5r62Cnd_2AhUwk1YBHYMgDKcQ6AF6BAgHEAI#v=onepage&q=%E0%A4%B2%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%B0%20%E0%A4%A0%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B0&f=false

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Unknown,
      I am unable to follow you, as the language is coded.

      Delete
  27. Actually my mool is Bear as well, But I want to know that in which part of Karnataka this bear village exists. I am actually very curious about it.

    ReplyDelete